AMD recommendations are allowed in other threads. i5-12600k vs i5-12400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations.
Rule #4: Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. No religion/politics unless it is directly related to Intel Corporation Rule 3: All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products. Rule 2: No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all. This includes comments such as "retard", "shill", "moron" and so on. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. Pricing the Performance Tuning Protection Plan insurance so low, though, tells you that Intel is pretty confident that you’ll be able to safely overclock the Core processors that the new plans protects.Subreddit and discord for Intel related news and discussions. The implication’s pretty clear: Intel’s happy if you overclock its chips, and it’s offering protection for those who choose to do so. Not only is that a substantial discount from the earlier version, but it’s also just 7 percent of the $263 purchase price of the Core i5-9600K.
Now, it’s $19.99 for the warranted period, which lasts three years, an Intel spokesman said. Originally, the Performance Tuning Protection Plan charged users a one-time fee of about $35. As before, the reborn PTPP will give you one free replacement part if you fry you qualifying Core chip while overclocking. Intel originally launched the PTPP several years ago, as part of the second-generation Core chips. But Intel’s own tools will make it simpler. The Performance Maximizer sounds somewhat similar to the very helpful Nvidia Scanner technology released alongside the GeForce RTX 20-series graphics cards.Įnthusiasts that decide to overclock will have a safety net in Intel’s Performance Tuning Protection Plan, too. Granted, the notion of auto-overclocking has existed within various motherboard-specific tools for several years now.
0 kommentar(er)
